(November 17, 2014 at 12:05 pm)Harry37 Wrote:(November 17, 2014 at 11:51 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:Good lord...
Harry, you have a claim that there was a worldwide flood. We say that there is no evidence for a worldwide flood, so it is unreasonable to believe that there was one. When asked for evidence, you just provided the claim again.
The bible is not evidence for the bible. I trust even you can see how circular that is, quoting scripture to justify scripture.
Rather than clog up the message with my response, you might consider the following site as "evidence" for the global flood:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APConten...ticle=1791
blessings,
Harry
No, again, this is not evidence. Independently verified, repeatable evidence regardless of faith or creed is the kind of evidence we're looking for. That sight has a vested interest in convincing people that there was a global flood, its "evidence" is unreliable. Peer-reviewed, scientific journal articles are a good place to start.
Additionally, what do you say to other Christians who hold that there was no global flood?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson
