Atheism is unreasonable

[downbeatplumb]

and why the hell do people use kinds like kinds of dogs kinds of fish no no use the correct term species because that's what you should really use.
can micro evolution on a dog turn it into something that is not a dog... no it can you just cant make something like a dog change like that.

Fish are an interesting choice.
Cod are more closely related to giraffes than they are hagfish.

It's strange but true that there's really no such thing as fish! Unlike with mammals and birds, not all the animals we call fish - aquatic, vertebrate animals covered with scales - descend from the same common ancestor. Put another way, if we go back to the most recent common ancestor of everything we now call fish, we find that it was also the ancestor of all four-legged, land vertebrates (tetrapods), which obviously aren't fish at all.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/animals/by/fish