Atheism is unreasonable

[dyresand]

Research? Ohh, I get it...what you meant to say was "should I tell you about all of the presuppostions that were made first in order to interpret what fossils actually mean...in the surrounding areas where they were found".

That revision wasn't pretty, but it was more accurate

No, it wasn't pretty at all.... And Einstein would have flunked you for coming up with such an ugly thing!

But why don't you tell us dumb atheists all about those "presuppositions that were made first in order to interpret what fossils actually mean"?
Tell us how unreasonable and unfounded they are.
Tell us how real faith in the invisible hand of an unknown agent is required.
Go on...

Nope.

Interesting... Willfully ignorant... you're a rare type of person... no curiosity.

Every heard of dog breeds?

So, races or breeds are varieties, it seems. How about subspecies?

And kinds are species?

Hey poca..newsflash: Dogs produce dogs.

You may want to take a look at this:

---

The image is a bit on the large side... it's best to save it to your hard drive and open it with a decent image viewing program, like ACDSEE or Irfanview

---

It seems wolves produced dogs which produced different breeds of dogs.
Again, this is nothing others haven't told you... it's clearly not a lack of information on your part... so, why?

---

I believe that wolves are a "kind" of dog.

ah... you believe....
Funny how a man-made classification methodology is subject to belief from you...

The whole species/genus/family/order/class/phylum/kingdom/domain classification scheme is nothing more than that - a classification. A man-made attempt to categorize all of life on this planet.
Why do you (and all creationists I've ever heard/read) wish to impose this alternative classification scheme without properly defining it?

they use creationism the easier way of understanding things than understanding the real truth of the world.