(November 19, 2014 at 10:26 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(November 19, 2014 at 10:23 am)Alex K Wrote: I don't quite understand the problem you all have with a specific hypothetical scenario. Assume you, i.e. your consciousness is not tied to your physical body, and god can talk to it directly.
It's useful as a thought experiment, but Rikky is obviously using it as a form of Pascals wager, which makes it inane.
Especially if his responses to our responses are just more apologetics. We could've started there.
As far as i know about this Pascals wager theory is that it is all about consequences of what would happen in this or that case while my asking is what would you think or say if you are found to be wrong.
Is this so hard to understand?
