(November 19, 2014 at 3:44 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 18, 2014 at 10:22 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Maj, since you don't accept that dinosaurs "involved" into birds, how do you account for the fact that chickens have inactive genes for teeth?
It is simple, chickens may have had teeth in the past, but for whatever reason, they don't anymore. I am not going to jump the gun like most of you people with the non-sequitur mindframe of "chickens don't have teeth now, but they did in the past, therefore, chickens evolved from X,Y, and Z".
It just doesn't follow, and such speculation is completely unwarranted, unless you have an agenda you want to push.
(November 18, 2014 at 10:25 pm)Beccs Wrote: A conspiracy by scientists to justify their pushing a non scientific THEORY like evolution on an unsuspecting and innocent Christian world to undermine the teachings of god.
Evil scientists!
Evil!
Is that a confirmation?
(November 19, 2014 at 10:21 am)Bad Wolf Wrote: What 'kind' is a red panda?
A damn bear.
It's a confirmation of the idiocy, paranoia, and mindset of the creationists who claim this nonsense.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
