Atheism is unreasonable

[Esquilax]

Cut the bio-babble and tell me when has the reptile-bird change ever been observed? I mean, it isn't as if there is a thousand differences between the two. Please tell me how that could have ever occured, sir.

You do this every time. Whenever you reach a scientific finding that you can't respond to, you just... don't. You call it babble, as though your inability to understand it must mean it's completely meaningless. It's just another symptom of the sheer arrogance with which you conduct yourself, that the possibility that you might not understand something because of some failure of knowledge on your part doesn't even cross your mind.

Incidentally, you're also ignoring every one of my rebuttals that's relevant to this question, like the dishonest, slimy little conman you are; live observation isn't required in science, deductions based upon evidence is enough, but you continue fellating Ken Ham's "observational science" crap as though it's actually applicable. The reptile to bird transition is more than accounted for in the fossil record, morphology and gene sequencing, the former of which is actually where those many transitions between the two are found. Your sole response to all of those is "doesn't count!"

You position is entirely intellectually bankrupt and hypocritical. You selectively cherry pick when you want to apply even your own criteria, you dismiss whatever science you can't answer (all of it), and you provide no evidence of your own.

For the last time: What is the mechanism that prevents small genetic changes over generations from accumulating to the point where species change would occur, and can you demonstrate this?