Atheism is unreasonable

[Esquilax]

If you want details, we'll have to delve into "biobabble". I didn't want to offend your obvious allergy to detail by doing so in this answer, but feel free to ask, "But Parks, why do they think that those dinosaurs evolved into birds?"

Questions are good.

This is exactly the problem, I think. H_M spends a lot of time asking for evidence, asking how we know this and that thing, where's the evidence, when has it been observed, yadda yadda.

It's just that when he is actually given what he asks for, he refuses to discuss it. Because that's what this "bio-babble" label is; it's not a legitimate criticism, it's a refusal to actually engage with the evidence he himself asked for. Whether it's because he's ignorant or dishonest I don't know, probably both, but "bio-babble" is in no way an actual position.