Atheism is unreasonable

[Thumpalumpacus]

Straw man.

The kind of infinity that I've argued AGAINST was a quantitative sense, since we were discussing time/events in terms of amounts and duration.

Quantity of what if not time, nor space?

No, you were saying your god wasn't infinite, either in time, or in space, and that means that one of my two points is true.

Let me sit back and watch you hop from one foot to the other trying to justify dishonest argumentation.

Then have at it...

I already have done so; I continue to do so; and I always will -- even as I continually question my own premises.

and since you are my "friend"..I will be there ever step of the way to put you right back on track when you start making illogical assertions....you know, logical fallacies....stuff like that. I will be right there to say "Parkers, that is absurd, because...."

While I acknowledge your expertise in absurdity (indeed, you've raised its practice to artistic heights) I don't think you're nearly so able to recognize it as you are to perpetrate it ... kinda like that guy you work with who's the funniest guy you know -- unintentionally.

Heyy, don't thank me...that's what friends are for

I will grant you this: you are a clear warning of what happens to a cogent mind when it imbibes religion too deeply; as such, you will always remind me to apply logic and reason to my every thinking endeavor. Again ... unintentionally.

---

You guys are spening time arguing with a christian moron who appearently thinks the "majesty" of his "god" is best glorified through an avatar in the form of the golden funerary mask of a pagan inbred boy pharaoh of Egypt who lived many centuries before the first desert goat fucker in the land of Cannites ever conceived of the yahweh that supposedly begat his "lord" and "savior".


That's doesn't look good on your resumes.

Do you cite forum posts on your resume?

Feel free to read another thread, if you're above it all.

---

And that's it? Nothing else?

So a lion and cheetah don't look alike?? They aren't the same kind of animal?...and organisms don't tend to look like the same organism that begat them?

They're clearly far from identical to anyone with half-a-brain.

Would you like me to go into the large differences? Be forewarned, it involves biobabble, and we all know how much you dislike that.

---

This is exactly the problem, I think. H_M spends a lot of time asking for evidence, asking how we know this and that thing, where's the evidence, when has it been observed, yadda yadda.

It's just that when he is actually given what he asks for, he refuses to discuss it. Because that's what this "bio-babble" label is; it's not a legitimate criticism, it's a refusal to actually engage with the evidence he himself asked for. Whether it's because he's ignorant or dishonest I don't know, probably both, but "bio-babble" is in no way an actual position.

[emphasis added -- Parks]

This is exactly why I'm going to adopt that label of his, and feed it back to him when he asks a question. There's no sense letting him forget that he's afraid of knowledge.