EvF -
This is what you're saying, from what I can make out : You're limited to only perceiving the physical. This tells you that there's something else, other than what you're limited to perceiving, namely, the nonphysical. Yet you say that there's no evidence for the nonphysical. Ok, you may not perceive the nonphysical, but you acknowledge that it must exist. If evidence means something you can perceive, then ok, there's no evidence that you can perceive (which again refers to your ability rather than what's really there). But if evidence means a reason to believe, then you believe.
The consciousness bit I'll give you (that's just my thing).
This is what you're saying, from what I can make out : You're limited to only perceiving the physical. This tells you that there's something else, other than what you're limited to perceiving, namely, the nonphysical. Yet you say that there's no evidence for the nonphysical. Ok, you may not perceive the nonphysical, but you acknowledge that it must exist. If evidence means something you can perceive, then ok, there's no evidence that you can perceive (which again refers to your ability rather than what's really there). But if evidence means a reason to believe, then you believe.
The consciousness bit I'll give you (that's just my thing).
