Atheism is unreasonable

[His_Majesty]

Your first statement contradicts your second. You can't say you accept forensic science but then demand that the only acceptable form of evidence you'll take for evolution is direct observation.

Just Esquilax, being wrong again? I didn't say JUST direct observation...I said OBSERVATON along with REPEATED EXPERIMENT. The vast majority of the time, I always used those two criterion TOGETHER just so I wouldn't have people trying to play the "ah ha!!! gotcha!!" games...but obviously it didn't work.

Forensic science doesn't rely on direct observation, it makes probabilistic deductions based on the available evidence. Those same kinds of deductions lead us to believe that dinosaurs and birds share a common ancestor. You can't switch the types of evidence that's required on the fly based solely on your own convenience.

They conduct experiments too, don't they? Or do you not watch the show?

---

Right, and birds are a "kind" of reptile (so are you and I). hrugs:

Anyone want an example of scientific indoctrination?....see above..