(November 20, 2014 at 3:54 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 20, 2014 at 3:46 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Everytime someone decides to observe the genetic sequence of birds and reptiles.
They aren't basing in on genetic sequences...they are basing it on the discovery of a fossil...and even if it was based on genetic sequences, it could mean common designer...you cannot rule out common designer, can you? So if you can't rule it out, then you can't definitely say that it was all due to evolution without intelligent design.
But we have evidence for evolution, and no evidence of a designer. Science doesn't work on "I can't rule it out, therefore it must have happened" logic. You're shifting the burden of proof, and you know it.
But then, you've never had any proof for even a single component of your beliefs, have you?
![Dodgy Dodgy](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!