RE: Atheism is unreasonable
November 20, 2014 at 9:30 pm
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2014 at 9:33 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(November 20, 2014 at 3:50 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: Species of the same kind of animal. You can get as many species of dogs you want...but they will all be dogs. No new "kind" of animal is being created like you would want to believe. No reptile-bird stuff has ever been observed.
Wrong. All dogs belong to one species, as has already been pointed out to you. And you've already been presented with reptile-avian fossil transitionals.
(November 20, 2014 at 3:50 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: I do, for the most part. Some of the premises in the arguments for the existence of my God have been scientifically verified with science...mainly, in cosmology...as we can scientifically prove that the universe began to exist. See how that works?
I can also prove that the Eiffel Tower didn't exist before 1889. That doesn't mean that Joe Blow from Pascagoula, MS built it in six days using tinkertoys.
"See how that works"?
(November 20, 2014 at 3:50 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: The scientific evidence followed by the philosophical evidence together as a whole allows me to draw the conclusion, unlike evolution.
There is no such thing as "philosophical evidence", firstly. Secondly, any conclusion about the source of the origin of the Universe necessarily oversteps the evidence currently at hand, because we are unable to examine the point of expansion.
(November 20, 2014 at 3:50 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: But I understand why you must believe in evolution, because after all, you have to be able to somehow explain the diversity in life without God, and evolution is the only game left in town...for you, it just HAVE to be evolution.
No, I mustn't believe in anything. However, I must follow the evidence. (That's a heuristic you'd do well to apply to yourself). The evidence for your deity is absent.
Feel free to correct me, in detail, either in this thread or another that you may start, called "The Evidence for the Christian God". I challenge you to do the latter ... if you dare.
(November 20, 2014 at 3:50 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: But sorry, charlie. No matter what the apostles for your religion tell you, there is no experimental nor observational evidence that has ever validated macroevolution.
As I've already pointed out, your dire need for education is obvious. You really don't need to buttress my point with these retarded claims of yours ... but hey, I'm nothing if not grateful. Keep talkin', kid.
When you want that education, let me know; I'll be happy to give you some pointers as to where to look.
No, I'm not holding my breath.