My naive questions

[Esquilax]

The one thing which cannot be gotton away from, is, there is plenty of sufficient scientific evidence based on reality that there is and has to be : A Personal theistic Creator/Designer for our Universe. This is obvious from creation and all the leftover effects that make up a reality of the highly personal, intelligence, and information laden biological entities. You never ever get such things from an impersonal Force, from Nothing, from raw Materials, from raw Chemicals , from the unproven speculation of multi universes . You get what we have ONLY from a WILLFUL Being who has a Mind and abilities to pull it off . All the 'big bang' explosions since time began wouldn't be enough to give us the personal, the intelligent designed Cosmos , the razor edge fine tuning of Life enabling Constants for us to be here, or the huge amount of complex information (1,000 volumes of an encyclopedia worth of information) found in each DNA molecule giving instructions in the form of an alphabet for a cell to construct in a very certain way.

Heavy on the assertions, completely lacking in any actual scientific evidence. This is just the argument from personal incredulity/ignorance: "I can't imagine how this could have come about without god, therefore it's impossible." It's a fallacy.

If you've got anything substantive, now's the time to say it. I just... really doubt you have anything substantive.

And this is a must have for $4.80 used copy which will fairly analyze which worldview is more reasonable and logical to follow : http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Have-Enough-F...1581345615

And we end on a Frank Turek recommendation. In some ways that's not surprising; that pair relies on the same fallacies you do.