My naive questions

[Esquilax]

No. , not yet. You see.....Im not like the other Theists who you run across --- I have adopted a new way of dispensing with the scientific evidence to Atheists. But it requires the atheist being qualified to receive it before I dispense it since precious few professed atheists really want the evidence / precious few wouldn't allow the evidence to have any effect on their apriori-commitment to atheism / precious few atheists arent willing to surrender their life to anyone else but themselves even if there was a Creator for the universe / precious few professed atheists aren't interested in the real truth and instead would never cash in their pseudo science beliefs / and most atheists enjoy playing a charade game with themselves as well as with Theists who are sincerely concerned about their eternity.

So basically you'll only post what you have if you're sure people will agree with you.

That doesn't sound like a path to truth to me. That sounds like a way for you to not have any evidence at all, do no work, yet still sit here in imagined superiority and crow about how dumb we atheists are. How about instead of clinging to your presuppositions that the only reason we won't outright agree with you is because of some character flaw on our part, something you literally could not know as you don't know any of us, you just present your evidence and let the chips fall where they may?

That said, I have an official QUALIFICATION TEST FOR ATHEISTS consisting of a few questions to be answered which are an absolute necessary mandate to determine IF the professed Atheist should get the evidence.

How very imperious of you. You know, real truth doesn't require a check beforehand to see if the person it's getting told to is ready to presuppose that it's true.

Now, the typical whining reply when I declare the above to an atheist is :' Awwwwe , you just don't have the scientific evidence to show us ' (and other similar hostile guff) . If the Person wishes to go with that then that is fine as I take a pass on them and encourage them to quit being idle about the most vital issue ever and to do a personal google investigation themselves for the evidences since its readily available anyway. For the Atheist who passes my Qualification Test, then it is that person who gets the evidence from myself which includes Me spending as much time with the Individual as he/she requires. But , what I refuse to do is to enter into a futile exchange with your all too common Atheist who is a complete time waster , not interested in truth , and is only interested in playing the charade of an atheistic worldview to bolster the many immoral lifestyles that compete for his/her enslavement. (aka : Total autonomy to live as one likes) .

Read: "Unless you're ready to agree with everything I say out of hand, I'm just going to assume you'll never agree with me at all, even if I'm right!"

Standard theistic claptrap.

This is my newest approach and its either my way or the Google- it -for -yourself Highway. Regards.

Modhat on: We have a thing called Rule One here, newbie. It requires that you actually contribute to the discussions we have here, if you wish to stay. If you're just going to play these evasive, passive aggressive games, you will be reported, and the mod team will sanction you.

You agreed to play by the rules of this forum when you joined up. If you proceed to break them now, that would be lying, which I'm fairly sure is against your religion, but one thing is certain: we will not be playing this your way, nor will "Google it!" suffice as a proper advancement of discussion. You have been warned.