Let The Creatard Shitting of Bricks Begineth

[Esquilax]

I noted 2 interesting words in that news release.
The word "May" and the word, "Could".
Seems those words come up frequently in dissertations about origins too.
I wonder why?
May (be) when elephants fly we Could ride them.
See, I can use those words just like NASA.

So you don't know anything about the practices of science, nor even basic logic. So maybe just stop talking about them, so we won't have to filter out more ignorant rambling?

Or are you actually trying to say that the confidence with which an idea is expressed correlates in any way to the truth of that idea? That a lie expressed with perfect confidence is true, whereas a truth expressed with hesitance is a lie? Is that what you're saying? And if you're not, then why the fuck would you bring up the wording choices- which are probabilistic since, unlike theism, science doesn't work under childish notions of certainty- at all? Are you going to acknowledge that evidence plays a part in whether an idea is true or not, and that the evidence in this case supports the idea that you're disagreeing with based on mindless nitpicking?