MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: August 6, 2025, 7:36 pm

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

Anomalocaris Offline

Stem arthropod

Religious Views: None

Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation: 85

#494

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)

December 1, 2014 at 9:09 pm

(December 1, 2014 at 8:37 pm)Minimalist Wrote: The Library of Congress collection of George Washington's personal papers has a search feature.

Ole George used the phrase "creator" 177 times.

He used the term "Providence" a total of 359 times but many of those seem to refer to Providence, Rhode Island.

The phrase "Jesus Christ" appears once...and that in a letter from his grandfather, Lawrence Washington, in 1698.

Just saying........

Still, it would have been an infinite improvement upon the HM that blabs now to start to disbelieve both Washington and Jesus

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 8:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 21, 2014 at 8:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 21, 2014 at 8:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 11:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 9:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 21, 2014 at 9:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by ManMachine - November 21, 2014 at 9:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 21, 2014 at 10:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 22, 2014 at 12:10 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 22, 2014 at 5:09 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 11:11 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 11:46 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 25, 2014 at 7:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 3:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 7:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 26, 2014 at 1:05 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 12:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 9:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by ManMachine - November 23, 2014 at 4:52 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - November 21, 2014 at 9:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 21, 2014 at 10:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 9:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 21, 2014 at 10:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 10:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 21, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 11:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 22, 2014 at 12:05 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:11 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 22, 2014 at 12:15 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 22, 2014 at 12:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 10:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 21, 2014 at 10:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 10:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 11:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 21, 2014 at 11:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 11:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 10:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 22, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 12:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 22, 2014 at 1:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 9:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 23, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 3:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 24, 2014 at 8:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 11:59 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 12:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 3:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 11:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 11:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 26, 2014 at 2:16 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 26, 2014 at 7:02 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 26, 2014 at 2:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 12:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 29, 2014 at 1:23 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 29, 2014 at 1:25 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 29, 2014 at 1:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 5:09 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 10:26 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 1:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 1:34 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 11:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 29, 2014 at 11:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 29, 2014 at 3:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 29, 2014 at 11:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 30, 2014 at 12:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 30, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 30, 2014 at 12:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 30, 2014 at 10:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 30, 2014 at 11:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 1, 2014 at 12:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 1, 2014 at 12:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 1, 2014 at 5:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 1, 2014 at 6:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 1, 2014 at 10:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 1, 2014 at 11:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 2, 2014 at 2:34 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 4:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 2, 2014 at 4:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 10:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 2, 2014 at 11:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - December 3, 2014 at 12:11 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 3, 2014 at 10:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by downbeatplumb - December 6, 2014 at 10:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 2, 2014 at 4:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 2, 2014 at 4:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 3, 2014 at 12:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 3, 2014 at 1:49 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 3, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 3, 2014 at 7:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 5, 2014 at 12:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 3, 2014 at 2:53 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 1, 2014 at 11:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 2, 2014 at 5:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 2, 2014 at 6:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 1, 2014 at 6:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 1, 2014 at 4:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 2, 2014 at 11:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by atheism is illogical - November 28, 2014 at 3:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Angrboda - November 30, 2014 at 7:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 30, 2014 at 8:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 30, 2014 at 9:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 8:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 8:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 11:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 1:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 1:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 22, 2014 at 3:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 21, 2014 at 10:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 11:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 22, 2014 at 12:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:24 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 22, 2014 at 12:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 22, 2014 at 1:40 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 22, 2014 at 1:53 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 22, 2014 at 9:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by MitchBenn - November 21, 2014 at 10:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - November 21, 2014 at 10:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 10:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 10:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 10:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 10:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - November 21, 2014 at 10:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 10:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by atheism is illogical - November 28, 2014 at 3:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 28, 2014 at 3:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - November 21, 2014 at 10:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 11:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 11:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 21, 2014 at 11:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by coldwx - November 21, 2014 at 11:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by coldwx - November 22, 2014 at 12:14 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 12:16 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by atheism is illogical - November 28, 2014 at 4:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 28, 2014 at 6:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Whateverist - November 28, 2014 at 10:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 12:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 12:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 12:35 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 3:12 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 12:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KUSA - November 22, 2014 at 1:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 1:54 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - November 22, 2014 at 2:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - November 22, 2014 at 5:13 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 10:56 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 10:57 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by coldwx - November 22, 2014 at 11:11 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 11:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 24, 2014 at 9:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 11:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 11:04 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 12:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 22, 2014 at 2:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - November 22, 2014 at 1:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 8:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 23, 2014 at 6:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 8:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 23, 2014 at 8:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 1:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 22, 2014 at 2:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 22, 2014 at 2:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 3:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 2:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 22, 2014 at 4:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 22, 2014 at 4:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 7:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 22, 2014 at 4:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 6:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 22, 2014 at 7:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 22, 2014 at 6:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 10:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 12:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 23, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 23, 2014 at 5:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 23, 2014 at 5:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 23, 2014 at 5:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 7:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 22, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 7:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 22, 2014 at 7:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 7:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 9:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 11:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - November 23, 2014 at 9:06 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - November 23, 2014 at 10:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 11:29 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 4:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 23, 2014 at 4:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 4:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 4:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 23, 2014 at 4:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 23, 2014 at 4:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 5:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 23, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 6:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 23, 2014 at 6:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 23, 2014 at 7:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 7:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 7:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 23, 2014 at 7:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 8:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 23, 2014 at 8:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 8:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 23, 2014 at 8:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 23, 2014 at 9:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 8:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 8:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 23, 2014 at 8:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 24, 2014 at 2:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 8:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 23, 2014 at 9:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 10:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by downbeatplumb - November 24, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 23, 2014 at 9:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 9:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 23, 2014 at 10:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 2:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by downbeatplumb - November 24, 2014 at 2:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 2:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 4:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 4:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 5:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 6:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 6:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 6:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 6:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 24, 2014 at 7:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 24, 2014 at 8:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 24, 2014 at 6:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 6:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 24, 2014 at 6:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 6:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 6:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 24, 2014 at 7:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 12:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 24, 2014 at 6:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 6:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 24, 2014 at 6:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 7:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 7:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 8:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 11:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 2:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 3:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 8:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 9:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cato - November 24, 2014 at 7:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 8:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 24, 2014 at 7:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - November 24, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 7:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 7:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 7:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 7:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 7:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 24, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - November 24, 2014 at 7:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 7:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 8:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 8:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 8:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 8:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 25, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 25, 2014 at 3:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 8:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 24, 2014 at 8:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 8:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 8:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 2:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 2:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 6:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 6:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 7:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 8:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - November 24, 2014 at 9:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 25, 2014 at 4:58 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 9:33 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 25, 2014 at 9:54 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 12:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 1:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 4:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 4:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 25, 2014 at 2:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 2:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 2:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 6:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 7:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 7:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 26, 2014 at 11:51 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 26, 2014 at 12:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 2:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 30, 2014 at 12:36 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Angrboda - November 30, 2014 at 8:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 29, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 11:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 25, 2014 at 5:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 8:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 25, 2014 at 8:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 9:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 25, 2014 at 9:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 11:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 12:34 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 3:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 11:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 26, 2014 at 2:38 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 26, 2014 at 3:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 26, 2014 at 3:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 3:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 25, 2014 at 11:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 3:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 25, 2014 at 3:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 11:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 12:25 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 25, 2014 at 12:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 25, 2014 at 12:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 1:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 1:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 2:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 1:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 4:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 11:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 2:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 2:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 2:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 2:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - November 25, 2014 at 2:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 2:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 25, 2014 at 3:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 3:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 3:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 3:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 3:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 3:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 3:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 3:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 4:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KevinM1 - November 25, 2014 at 4:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 4:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KevinM1 - November 25, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 4:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - November 25, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 6:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 25, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 25, 2014 at 7:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 8:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 25, 2014 at 8:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 8:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 9:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 9:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 9:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 11:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 11:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 26, 2014 at 1:28 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 26, 2014 at 2:38 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 9:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 26, 2014 at 8:13 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 26, 2014 at 10:08 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 26, 2014 at 11:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 26, 2014 at 12:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 26, 2014 at 12:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 26, 2014 at 1:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 26, 2014 at 3:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 26, 2014 at 3:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 4:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 26, 2014 at 4:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 3:36 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 29, 2014 at 2:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 30, 2014 at 10:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 30, 2014 at 10:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 30, 2014 at 10:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - December 1, 2014 at 12:14 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 1, 2014 at 10:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - December 1, 2014 at 10:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 1, 2014 at 10:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 1, 2014 at 10:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 1:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 2, 2014 at 1:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 2, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 2, 2014 at 2:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 2:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 3:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 3:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 2, 2014 at 12:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 1, 2014 at 6:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 26, 2014 at 6:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 26, 2014 at 10:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 26, 2014 at 10:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 11:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 28, 2014 at 7:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 28, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 26, 2014 at 11:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 28, 2014 at 3:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 28, 2014 at 3:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 28, 2014 at 4:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Smaug - November 28, 2014 at 6:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 28, 2014 at 7:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 28, 2014 at 7:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 28, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 1:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 2:24 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 29, 2014 at 2:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 29, 2014 at 4:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 9:29 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 1:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 29, 2014 at 3:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 29, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 3:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 29, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 29, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 29, 2014 at 6:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 29, 2014 at 6:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 9:31 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by vorlon13 - November 29, 2014 at 10:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Natachan - November 29, 2014 at 10:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 1:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 3:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 4:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 6:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 6:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 6:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 29, 2014 at 6:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 7:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 29, 2014 at 11:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 11:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 30, 2014 at 12:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 30, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 30, 2014 at 12:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 30, 2014 at 1:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 30, 2014 at 2:01 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 11:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 30, 2014 at 1:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 30, 2014 at 10:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 30, 2014 at 10:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 30, 2014 at 10:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 30, 2014 at 10:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 30, 2014 at 10:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 30, 2014 at 1:43 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 30, 2014 at 3:29 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 30, 2014 at 3:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 30, 2014 at 3:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 30, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 30, 2014 at 2:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 30, 2014 at 2:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 30, 2014 at 2:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 30, 2014 at 3:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 30, 2014 at 3:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 30, 2014 at 3:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 30, 2014 at 6:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 30, 2014 at 7:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 30, 2014 at 7:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 30, 2014 at 10:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 1, 2014 at 12:28 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 1, 2014 at 12:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 1, 2014 at 9:45 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 1, 2014 at 10:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Natachan - December 1, 2014 at 12:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 1, 2014 at 1:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 1, 2014 at 1:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 1, 2014 at 2:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 1, 2014 at 1:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 1, 2014 at 2:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Natachan - December 1, 2014 at 2:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 1, 2014 at 2:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 1, 2014 at 5:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 1, 2014 at 6:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 1, 2014 at 8:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 1, 2014 at 9:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pigsworld - December 6, 2014 at 1:14 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 1, 2014 at 10:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 1, 2014 at 10:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 12:49 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 2, 2014 at 5:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 5:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 10:43 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 10:49 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 11:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 11:04 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 2, 2014 at 12:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 12:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 12:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 2, 2014 at 12:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 2, 2014 at 2:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 2, 2014 at 12:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 12:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 12:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 1:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 2, 2014 at 1:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 2, 2014 at 1:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 1:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - December 2, 2014 at 1:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 4:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 5:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 5:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 2, 2014 at 5:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - December 2, 2014 at 6:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 2, 2014 at 7:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 2, 2014 at 10:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 2, 2014 at 6:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 4:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 2, 2014 at 4:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 4:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 2, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 5:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - December 2, 2014 at 6:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 6:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 6:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 7:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 2, 2014 at 10:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KUSA - December 2, 2014 at 11:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 3, 2014 at 12:09 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 2, 2014 at 11:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 3, 2014 at 1:52 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 3, 2014 at 9:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 3, 2014 at 10:14 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Angrboda - December 3, 2014 at 3:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 3, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 3, 2014 at 5:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 3, 2014 at 5:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 3, 2014 at 6:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 3, 2014 at 9:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 3, 2014 at 7:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 4, 2014 at 9:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - December 3, 2014 at 6:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 3, 2014 at 6:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 3, 2014 at 9:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 3, 2014 at 7:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 3, 2014 at 7:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Natachan - December 3, 2014 at 7:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 3, 2014 at 7:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 3, 2014 at 9:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 3, 2014 at 9:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 4, 2014 at 12:17 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 4, 2014 at 2:13 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 4, 2014 at 3:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 4, 2014 at 1:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 4, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 4, 2014 at 1:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 4, 2014 at 2:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 4, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 4, 2014 at 9:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 4, 2014 at 9:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 4, 2014 at 9:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 4, 2014 at 10:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 5, 2014 at 12:05 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 5, 2014 at 12:40 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 5, 2014 at 2:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - December 5, 2014 at 2:51 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 8:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 6, 2014 at 9:05 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - December 6, 2014 at 5:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - December 6, 2014 at 6:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - December 6, 2014 at 7:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 8:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 6, 2014 at 9:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - December 6, 2014 at 9:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 6, 2014 at 9:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - December 6, 2014 at 10:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 12:13 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 6, 2014 at 9:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - December 6, 2014 at 10:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 7, 2014 at 11:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - December 7, 2014 at 11:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 7, 2014 at 1:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 7, 2014 at 11:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 12:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 7, 2014 at 2:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 7, 2014 at 11:24 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 7, 2014 at 10:31 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 5, 2014 at 2:56 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 5, 2014 at 3:01 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 10:04 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 5, 2014 at 3:53 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 6, 2014 at 9:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 6, 2014 at 12:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 12:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 6, 2014 at 12:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 6, 2014 at 12:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 12:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 6, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 1:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 6, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 6, 2014 at 1:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 6, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KevinM1 - December 6, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 7:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - December 6, 2014 at 6:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 6, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 7:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - December 6, 2014 at 6:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 6, 2014 at 7:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 6, 2014 at 8:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 7, 2014 at 11:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 7, 2014 at 11:36 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 7, 2014 at 11:42 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 7, 2014 at 11:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 7, 2014 at 11:46 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 7, 2014 at 11:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 7, 2014 at 12:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 12:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 7, 2014 at 12:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 3:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 7, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 7, 2014 at 7:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 7, 2014 at 9:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 7, 2014 at 9:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 5:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 7, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 7, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 7, 2014 at 6:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 7, 2014 at 6:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 7, 2014 at 6:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 7, 2014 at 6:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 7, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 7, 2014 at 5:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 5:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 6:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 7:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 7, 2014 at 8:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 8, 2014 at 2:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 8, 2014 at 6:39 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 8, 2014 at 9:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 8, 2014 at 9:10 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 8, 2014 at 3:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 8, 2014 at 4:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 8, 2014 at 5:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 8, 2014 at 5:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - December 8, 2014 at 5:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 8, 2014 at 5:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 8, 2014 at 7:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 8, 2014 at 7:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 8, 2014 at 9:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 9, 2014 at 4:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 9, 2014 at 4:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 8, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 8, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 8, 2014 at 10:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 9, 2014 at 4:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 9, 2014 at 4:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 9, 2014 at 5:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 9, 2014 at 11:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 10, 2014 at 2:15 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 10, 2014 at 9:23 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 10, 2014 at 11:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 15, 2014 at 10:01 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 10:04 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 10:11 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 15, 2014 at 10:36 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 15, 2014 at 10:12 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 15, 2014 at 10:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 15, 2014 at 10:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 10:27 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 15, 2014 at 10:28 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 15, 2014 at 10:31 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Anomalocaris - December 15, 2014 at 10:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 10:57 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 15, 2014 at 10:32 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 10:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 12:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 15, 2014 at 1:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 15, 2014 at 1:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 1:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 15, 2014 at 1:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 3:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 15, 2014 at 2:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 15, 2014 at 1:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 15, 2014 at 2:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 15, 2014 at 4:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 4:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 4:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 2:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 15, 2014 at 3:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 4:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 15, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 12:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 5:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 10:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 10:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 5:35 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 17, 2014 at 8:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 6:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 6:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 15, 2014 at 6:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 6:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 6:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 15, 2014 at 7:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 16, 2014 at 12:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 16, 2014 at 12:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 2:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 12:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 16, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 2:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 2:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 7:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 15, 2014 at 7:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 8:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 15, 2014 at 8:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 9:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 9:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 15, 2014 at 8:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 9:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 9:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 12:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 1:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 10:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 9:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 9:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 10:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 10:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 10:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 10:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 11:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 10:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 11:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 2:16 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 3:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 4:20 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 4:28 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 16, 2014 at 1:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 16, 2014 at 2:57 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Ryantology - December 16, 2014 at 8:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 16, 2014 at 8:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 16, 2014 at 8:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 4:29 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 9:23 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 4:32 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 4:36 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 4:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 4:48 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 5:08 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 6:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 16, 2014 at 10:29 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 5:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 5:40 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 16, 2014 at 6:03 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 6:47 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 8:09 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 8:18 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 9:05 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 9:35 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 16, 2014 at 10:35 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 11:15 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 12:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 12:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 12:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 12:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 16, 2014 at 12:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 12:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 12:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 12:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 16, 2014 at 12:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 12:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 12:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 16, 2014 at 1:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 1:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 1:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 16, 2014 at 1:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 16, 2014 at 1:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 1:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 1:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 1:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 2:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 16, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 16, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 16, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 16, 2014 at 2:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 16, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 16, 2014 at 2:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 16, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 16, 2014 at 2:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 16, 2014 at 3:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 3:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 3:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 16, 2014 at 3:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 16, 2014 at 5:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 5:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 16, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 16, 2014 at 5:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 6:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 16, 2014 at 6:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 7:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 3:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 3:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 4:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 5:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 16, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 6:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 16, 2014 at 7:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 7:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 7:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 16, 2014 at 7:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 7:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 7:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 16, 2014 at 10:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 11:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 11:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 1:06 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 17, 2014 at 1:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 3:02 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 5:38 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 17, 2014 at 11:40 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 12:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 9:04 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 17, 2014 at 11:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 11:55 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 17, 2014 at 12:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 1:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 17, 2014 at 1:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 17, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 17, 2014 at 2:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 17, 2014 at 12:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 12:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 12:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 17, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 17, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 2:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 5:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 17, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 18, 2014 at 8:16 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 18, 2014 at 4:35 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 18, 2014 at 7:25 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 18, 2014 at 7:28 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 18, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 18, 2014 at 2:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 18, 2014 at 3:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 19, 2014 at 12:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 1:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 19, 2014 at 1:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 2:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 2:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 2:54 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 3:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 4:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 19, 2014 at 4:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 5:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 6:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 19, 2014 at 6:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 19, 2014 at 6:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 19, 2014 at 6:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 19, 2014 at 7:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 20, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 1:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 20, 2014 at 4:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 19, 2014 at 7:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 3:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 19, 2014 at 3:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 19, 2014 at 4:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 4:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 4:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 6:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 4:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 4:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 4:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 19, 2014 at 4:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 4:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 4:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 6:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 6:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 7:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 7:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 12:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Losty - December 21, 2014 at 1:12 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 1:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Losty - December 21, 2014 at 1:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 8:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 8:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 19, 2014 at 8:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 8:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 2:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 7:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 10:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 1:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 1:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 3:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 3:18 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 3:23 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 21, 2014 at 6:15 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 20, 2014 at 1:57 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 11:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 20, 2014 at 12:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 12:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 12:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 12:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 1:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 20, 2014 at 12:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 20, 2014 at 12:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 20, 2014 at 1:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 1:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 20, 2014 at 2:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 20, 2014 at 3:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Grand Nudger - December 20, 2014 at 3:54 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 20, 2014 at 3:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 20, 2014 at 4:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 4:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 5:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 5:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 5:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 2:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 11:42 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 12:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 12:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 12:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 12:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 21, 2014 at 1:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 1:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 1:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 2:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 5:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 22, 2014 at 4:12 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 1:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 21, 2014 at 1:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 21, 2014 at 2:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 21, 2014 at 2:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 1:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 20, 2014 at 5:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 11:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 20, 2014 at 4:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 21, 2014 at 4:10 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 12:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 1:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 1:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 21, 2014 at 1:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 2:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 2:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 3:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 3:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 3:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 21, 2014 at 3:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 4:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 5:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 4:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 21, 2014 at 2:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 2:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 4:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 5:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 6:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 21, 2014 at 6:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 6:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 3:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 1:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 2:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 21, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 5:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 10:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 10:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 4:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 4:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 21, 2014 at 4:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 4:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 21, 2014 at 5:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 22, 2014 at 4:58 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 21, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 4:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 21, 2014 at 4:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 21, 2014 at 5:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 21, 2014 at 5:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 5:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 21, 2014 at 5:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 5:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 10:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 3:59 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 2:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 22, 2014 at 2:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 2:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 2:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 3:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 3:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 3:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 22, 2014 at 6:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by KevinM1 - December 22, 2014 at 7:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 23, 2014 at 1:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 22, 2014 at 3:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 10:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 2:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 2:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 2:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 3:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 3:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 3:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 3:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 22, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 2:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 22, 2014 at 6:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 6:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 23, 2014 at 5:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 21, 2014 at 5:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 21, 2014 at 9:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 21, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 6:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 6:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 6:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 7:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 9:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 9:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 9:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 9:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 9:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 10:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 10:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 10:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 10:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 12:19 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 22, 2014 at 10:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 1:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 21, 2014 at 10:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 10:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 10:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 10:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 10:57 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 21, 2014 at 11:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:02 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 6:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 21, 2014 at 11:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 22, 2014 at 12:03 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 1:04 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 1:15 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 3:56 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 4:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 9:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:06 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:23 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:26 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 22, 2014 at 10:31 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 22, 2014 at 10:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:48 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:26 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:28 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:46 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 10:58 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:04 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 11:17 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 11:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:56 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 12:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 12:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 12:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 11:06 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 22, 2014 at 11:07 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:19 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by ThomM - December 22, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 10:49 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 11:08 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 22, 2014 at 11:20 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 11:30 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 11:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 11:57 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:59 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 12:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 12:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 12:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 22, 2014 at 12:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 12:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 12:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 12:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 1:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 1:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 22, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 12:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 12:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 22, 2014 at 12:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 12:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 12:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 1:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 1:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 2:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 2:57 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 4:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 3:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 3:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 3:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 22, 2014 at 3:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 4:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 3:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by KevinM1 - December 22, 2014 at 3:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 3:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 22, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 22, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by KevinM1 - December 22, 2014 at 4:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 4:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 4:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 4:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 4:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 4:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 4:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 4:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 1:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 22, 2014 at 4:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 22, 2014 at 4:54 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 5:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 6:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 6:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 5:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 5:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 5:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 6:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 22, 2014 at 5:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 22, 2014 at 9:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 5:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 22, 2014 at 5:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 5:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 6:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 7:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 7:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 7:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 22, 2014 at 11:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 11:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 1:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 23, 2014 at 1:29 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 23, 2014 at 1:43 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 1:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 23, 2014 at 1:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 23, 2014 at 2:11 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 2:05 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 23, 2014 at 3:53 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 5:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 11:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 11:26 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 23, 2014 at 11:47 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 11:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 23, 2014 at 1:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 23, 2014 at 5:22 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 23, 2014 at 11:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 11:32 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 11:38 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 23, 2014 at 11:43 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 11:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 11:53 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 23, 2014 at 12:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 23, 2014 at 3:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by KevinM1 - December 23, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 23, 2014 at 4:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 23, 2014 at 3:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 23, 2014 at 3:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 23, 2014 at 3:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 23, 2014 at 4:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 4:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 23, 2014 at 4:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 23, 2014 at 9:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - January 12, 2015 at 5:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Mystical - December 30, 2014 at 10:46 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - January 12, 2015 at 5:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - January 12, 2015 at 5:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - January 12, 2015 at 5:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm

The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 11, 2014 at 10:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Neo-Scholastic - December 11, 2014 at 10:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 11, 2014 at 10:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 12:08 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 12, 2014 at 12:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 12:28 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Exian - December 12, 2014 at 12:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 12:39 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 1:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 12, 2014 at 1:38 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 1:42 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 2:06 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 12, 2014 at 4:25 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Losty - December 12, 2014 at 4:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 12, 2014 at 4:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 12, 2014 at 6:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Grand Nudger - December 12, 2014 at 9:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 12, 2014 at 9:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 9:50 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 9:58 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 12, 2014 at 9:58 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 9:59 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 10:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 12, 2014 at 1:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 5:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 6:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 12, 2014 at 6:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - December 12, 2014 at 6:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Mystical - December 12, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 7:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Mystical - December 12, 2014 at 7:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 7:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 12, 2014 at 7:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 7:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 8:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Simon Moon - December 12, 2014 at 8:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 8:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - December 12, 2014 at 10:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 13, 2014 at 12:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 13, 2014 at 1:01 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 13, 2014 at 1:15 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Exian - December 13, 2014 at 1:45 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 13, 2014 at 6:16 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 13, 2014 at 6:17 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 13, 2014 at 8:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 13, 2014 at 8:54 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 13, 2014 at 8:58 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 13, 2014 at 9:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 13, 2014 at 9:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 13, 2014 at 10:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 13, 2014 at 3:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 13, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 13, 2014 at 4:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Simon Moon - December 13, 2014 at 5:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 13, 2014 at 5:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Simon Moon - December 13, 2014 at 9:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 13, 2014 at 10:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 14, 2014 at 12:01 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 14, 2014 at 12:21 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 2:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 14, 2014 at 8:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 9:21 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 1:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 14, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 14, 2014 at 1:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 1:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 1:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 14, 2014 at 1:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 1:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cato - December 14, 2014 at 1:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 14, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 2:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 14, 2014 at 2:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - December 14, 2014 at 2:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 2:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 14, 2014 at 2:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 2:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 14, 2014 at 2:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 14, 2014 at 2:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 2:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 2:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 14, 2014 at 3:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 3:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 14, 2014 at 3:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 14, 2014 at 3:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 3:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cato - December 14, 2014 at 3:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 3:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 4:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 4:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 4:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 4:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by abaris - December 14, 2014 at 4:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 4:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 4:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by abaris - December 14, 2014 at 4:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 4:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 14, 2014 at 4:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 4:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 14, 2014 at 4:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 5:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 14, 2014 at 5:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 5:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 5:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 5:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Strider - December 14, 2014 at 5:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 14, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 5:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 6:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Strider - December 14, 2014 at 6:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 6:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 14, 2014 at 6:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 7:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 14, 2014 at 7:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 15, 2014 at 7:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 7:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 1:43 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 1:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 1:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 2:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 5:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 5:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 6:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 15, 2014 at 6:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 15, 2014 at 9:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thor - December 15, 2014 at 9:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thor - December 16, 2014 at 10:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 15, 2014 at 2:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 15, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 5:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 6:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 3:16 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 15, 2014 at 4:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 4:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 5:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 10:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 3:17 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 15, 2014 at 3:46 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 4:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 15, 2014 at 5:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 10:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cato - December 15, 2014 at 10:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 4:05 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 5:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 15, 2014 at 6:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 4:54 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 4:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 4:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 5:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 5:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 5:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 7:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 15, 2014 at 7:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 15, 2014 at 8:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 8:48 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 5:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cato - December 15, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 15, 2014 at 6:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 11:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 15, 2014 at 11:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 12:22 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 1:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 1:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 16, 2014 at 1:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 9:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 16, 2014 at 10:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 16, 2014 at 10:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 10:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 17, 2014 at 2:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 2:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 17, 2014 at 2:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 2:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 17, 2014 at 2:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 17, 2014 at 2:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 17, 2014 at 2:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 17, 2014 at 2:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 2:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 19, 2014 at 3:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 19, 2014 at 3:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 4:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 19, 2014 at 6:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 8:01 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 20, 2014 at 11:38 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 1:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 20, 2014 at 3:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 3:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 3:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 3:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 3:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 4:06 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 11:48 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 20, 2014 at 11:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 20, 2014 at 12:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 20, 2014 at 12:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 4:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 20, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 3:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 4:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 17, 2014 at 2:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 2:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 2:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 2:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 2:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 19, 2014 at 2:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 19, 2014 at 2:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 17, 2014 at 3:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 3:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 18, 2014 at 2:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 18, 2014 at 3:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 18, 2014 at 2:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 18, 2014 at 2:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 17, 2014 at 3:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 5:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 5:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 5:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 5:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 5:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 5:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 6:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 17, 2014 at 6:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 18, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 12:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 19, 2014 at 12:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 3:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 4:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 19, 2014 at 6:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 12:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 20, 2014 at 1:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 1:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 2:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 1:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 4:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 6:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 6:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 6:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 4:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 7:09 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 2:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 2:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 8:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 15, 2014 at 8:49 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 15, 2014 at 9:46 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 11:43 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Psalm 110 is about the Israelite king, not Jesus Christ	GrandizerII	0	166	July 12, 2025 at 11:38 pm Last Post: GrandizerII
	To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ?	JJoseph	52	7815	June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm Last Post: arewethereyet
	The power of Christ...	zwanzig	60	9462	August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm Last Post: Bucky Ball
	Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan	Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric	36	11399	December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am Last Post: LinuxGal
	Creating Christ	JML	26	5424	September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm Last Post: Jehanne
	So has Christ returned	TheClearCleanStuff	31	5723	May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm Last Post: Fake Messiah
	CHRIST THE KICKER……	BrianSoddingBoru4	15	2309	January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am Last Post: brewer
	CHRIST THE KILLER.....	ronedee	31	5033	December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm Last Post: Ferrocyanide
	Why I believe in Jesus Christ	Ai Somoto	20	4398	June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm Last Post: Nay_Sayer
	In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation?	GrandizerII	159	27192	November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am Last Post: Abaddon_ire

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me