Seems as though logical analysis of arguments happens long after a person has decided where he stands on the issue. It is more an effort to make the choice seem like more of slam dunk than it is. Logic in the service of rhetoric.
So picking apart the poor construction of a person's logical argument never gets at anything on which the person's belief actually depends. You are simply giving them feed back on how to improve their presentation.
So picking apart the poor construction of a person's logical argument never gets at anything on which the person's belief actually depends. You are simply giving them feed back on how to improve their presentation.