Regarding our Rule on Insults (Please read post before voting)

[Cego_Colher]

I just kept going back to it even though I didn't want to. I have no self-control. I should eat the rest of the ice-cream in the freezer. It was also: "you didn't read what I said. This is what I said..." and "no, you didn't read what I said..." I think if it wasn't uhm, angering me I'd be more like "eh, whatever." That's a bit selfish, oh, well. Even though, I wasn't on In the Mind's "side" I am still female and the subject of rape is still a difficult one. I guess I'm just saying I am biased?

I can understand where you are coming from, though. I also agree with just because a thread is long isn't a reason to lock it. Had it not been locked I might not have complained either.

I kinda think the thread might have ended with whoever screams loudest is the winner.
However, I feel different about the cecco threads, because, they didn't make me mad? Well, and also they were more of the type of threads that you could just say "don't feed the trolls."

(I sent Eilonnwy a PM saying that I was glad she did and I didn't want to seem like a hypocrite. This is why I stated how I feel/felt about the objectification thread. Or I could be allowing people to see my hypocrisy, whichever one works best.)