RE: Ban
July 22, 2010 at 9:38 am
(This post was last modified: July 22, 2010 at 9:46 am by Jaysyn.)
(July 22, 2010 at 8:08 am)Godhead Wrote: That would make more sense. Or, leave it up to the owner. The anti smoker movement, despite being well funded and coordinated, doesn't represent true freedom.
As an ex-cigarette smoker let me say that your right to enjoy that cigarette ends at my nose.
(July 22, 2010 at 3:40 am)tackattack Wrote: So those people who now can't smoke inside a restaurant in their own section, now have to stand outside and every man, woman and child walking in or out gets second hand smoke instead of those who choose to sit in the smoking section?
You're either being disingenuous or outright misinformed if you think that is actually how it works. Outdoors is not a closed environment. Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a pool.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
