(December 16, 2014 at 8:20 pm)simplemoss Wrote:(June 14, 1970 at 1:01 am)lifesagift Wrote: I get what you're saying, you're just making the point really badly. Belligerence tramples over respect. And war is only about belligerence.well first of all war is not all "belligerent" it's sometimes necessary. Second of all, the ransom would've been paid by the government. This isn't a kidnapping, James Foley was a prisoner of war, he could've easily been realeased in exchange for alqueda members currently in USA prisons which we've done and will continue too do.
Asked the question, would I want my son's body back then yes I would. Were I a multi billionaire, a mill would be nothing, but to rest of us, it's pain and propaganda.
And the other thing is you miss the real focus and you don't criticise the murderous scumbags... disappointing line of argument my friend.
Thridly, there's enough hatred towards Muslims in the west why portray myself as another white Christian bigot who actively calls for the genocide of all Muslims and publically banning them from simply practicing their religion. I defend the Jews too the same degree, there's enough neonazi assholes in America blaming them for everything and anything, calling for their genocide, why pile on??? Because I disagree with religion?
@ Becca and parkers i don't know what your obsession is with feet in peoples mouths and assholes but if wanna explain what u mean by that, i would just like u too know im here too help
Prisoner of war? No, you fuckhead, he was a hostage. He was a non-combatant.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
