Okay then. Now that the introductions are over how about we establish something before we continue:
There are no repeatable, observable, verifiable scientific experiments that can prove any Biblical miraculous wonder every happened, correct?
Science is famous for backing up it's beliefs with repeatable, observable, verifiable scientific experiments that anyone can do for themselves and get the same results, right? Science does not base any of it's beliefs on "blind faith". From an atheist scientific perspective, only fools base their beliefs on 'blind faith' instead of on the proverbial 'rock of reality' of objective, repeatable, observable scientific experiments that verify whatever science holds as true.
Can we agree that this basic premise is what makes science superior to 'blind faith' religion?
There are no repeatable, observable, verifiable scientific experiments that can prove any Biblical miraculous wonder every happened, correct?
Science is famous for backing up it's beliefs with repeatable, observable, verifiable scientific experiments that anyone can do for themselves and get the same results, right? Science does not base any of it's beliefs on "blind faith". From an atheist scientific perspective, only fools base their beliefs on 'blind faith' instead of on the proverbial 'rock of reality' of objective, repeatable, observable scientific experiments that verify whatever science holds as true.
Can we agree that this basic premise is what makes science superior to 'blind faith' religion?