RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 10:58 am
(December 22, 2014 at 10:52 am)Brucer Wrote:(December 22, 2014 at 10:49 am)pocaracas Wrote: Well, Brucer... you're right.... everyone seems to be jumping at you... kangaroo style!
So, first and foremost, welcome to this here forum. I noticed you didn't create your own intro thread in the part of the forum where we all have to behave. It would have been nice if you did, since we like to welcome people to the group and get to know a bit of the person behind the avatar.
Instead, you jumped right into an ongoing discussion. So... people showed you no quarters... this sort of thing tends to happen, around here.
So, back on topic, and trying to shed away all the baggage you accumulated over the past few days.
What's your take on the resurrection story?
Has His_Majesty been presenting his case in a way you'd approve?
What would you like to add to what he's presented?
There was no resurrection. He's dead, and will remain dead, forever.
His_Majesty is wholly indoctrinated. I am not. I do not follow any Christian beliefs, and by Christian I mean Pauline.
Ah... yes... I seem to remember someone writing that around here a while back... it must have been you.
So then, you believe there was a Jesus that died.... crucified?
Care to explain what parts of the NT you're cherry-picking?... it seems anything pauline should be removed, huh?
