RE: The genetic similarity between man and Cambanzy Is it true?
December 29, 2014 at 6:58 am
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2014 at 7:01 am by robvalue.)
Was this article from answers in genesis?
If so, without even having to look at it, we can confidently tell you that it's propaganda and not in any way science. People make a living out of being professional liars, and this is one of the outlets. If it will help you, we can eventually look at it and give you some idea why this is the case.
If it's from somewhere else, we can check it out in due course.
I would recommend being highly suspicious of any religious articles which claim to be using science; almost always these are deceitful and ignorant works intended to reassure people who are already religious but which any serious sceptic would ignore.
To make my point, even if evolution is proved to be completely wrong, as many of these liars continue to try to do, it does not lend any merit to any alternative explanation such as "God did it", where this alternative has no evidence behind it.
Of course I'm not suggesting anyone automatically ignore any article made by religious people on scientific subjects, that would be ridiculous. Each one should be examined on its own merits. But once a source (like answers in genesis) has produced nothing but lies and pretend science for years, you start to not bother checking out the new stuff past a cursory glance if someone asks you to.
If I waffle too much or use words you're not familiar with, please ask and I'll clarify
If so, without even having to look at it, we can confidently tell you that it's propaganda and not in any way science. People make a living out of being professional liars, and this is one of the outlets. If it will help you, we can eventually look at it and give you some idea why this is the case.
If it's from somewhere else, we can check it out in due course.
I would recommend being highly suspicious of any religious articles which claim to be using science; almost always these are deceitful and ignorant works intended to reassure people who are already religious but which any serious sceptic would ignore.
To make my point, even if evolution is proved to be completely wrong, as many of these liars continue to try to do, it does not lend any merit to any alternative explanation such as "God did it", where this alternative has no evidence behind it.
Of course I'm not suggesting anyone automatically ignore any article made by religious people on scientific subjects, that would be ridiculous. Each one should be examined on its own merits. But once a source (like answers in genesis) has produced nothing but lies and pretend science for years, you start to not bother checking out the new stuff past a cursory glance if someone asks you to.
If I waffle too much or use words you're not familiar with, please ask and I'll clarify

Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum