RE: Evolution is riddled with holes like a piece of Swiss cheese
December 29, 2014 at 7:02 pm
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2014 at 7:04 pm by Whateverist.)
(December 29, 2014 at 6:53 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: Carbon-14 dating is just one example from the very long laundry list of inconsistencies and holes in the theory. Radiocarbon dates that do not fit evolutionary theory are often excluded by alleging cross-contamination of the sample. In this manner, an evolutionist can present a sample for analysis, and tell the laboratory that he assumes the sample to be somewhere between 50,000 years old and 100,000 years old. Dates that do not conform to this estimate are thrown out. Most C-14 dates are thrown out.
The accuracy of carbon-14 dating relies on faulty assumptions and is subject to bias. At best, radiocarbon dating is only accurate for the past few thousand years. It is science's dirty little secret, and yet they continue to lie that it is proof of evolution.
Oh dear! The morons are attacking the sacred texts of atheistic science again. Whatever shall we do? May I suggest one of the following replies?
(a)
(b) 
© 
(d) 
(e) 
