Evolution is riddled with holes like a piece of Swiss cheese

[Jenny A]

Evolution gives atheists a basis for explaining how life exists apart from a Creator God. Evolution denies the need for a God to be involved in the universe. Evolution is the “creation theory” for the religion of atheism. According to the Bible, the choice is clear. We can believe the Word of our omnipotent and omniscient God, or we can believe the illogically biased, “scientific” explanations of fools.

Were evolution disproved overnight, I'd accept that but, remain atheist. I'm atheist not because of competing theories for the origin of life (hint, Darwin's theory evolution doesn't attempt to explain the origin of life, only why life evolves) but because there is no evidence that god exists. None. Evolution has deconverted many Christians, but it is not necessary to atheism. It is only a stumbling block to Christians who believe that Genesis is literally true.

Obviously, the evidences for Evolution is obtained through an / a philosophical & Ideological bias, One just has to see the answers posted on this forum by Atheist to see that with their lying Evolution Web sites and pseudo-Science they employ.

Hardly. Before you call it pseudo science, I'd like to see an explanation of why exactly you consider it pseudo science. The vast majority of scientists in other disciplines don't think it's pseudo science, nor do the vast majority of skeptics. Why do you? [Note: Evidence is a mass noun and therefore rarely needs a plural. The plural form would indicate not just multiple facts supporting evolution but multiple bodies of fact.]

What is tragic is that many Christians (and I use that word Christian loosely) are succumbing to worldly pressure to adjust their theology to “Make it Fit”

Not tragic, sane. If you believe in something based on faith, it is sane to adjust your belief when it conflicts with reality.

For it is Written “ 2 Timothy 4:3-4 (NKJV) For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, [because] they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn [their] ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.

A fable is:

a short story that usually is about animals and that is intended to teach a lesson

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fable

Evolution is not intended to teach a lesson, only to describe the world as it is. That description is based on observed fact, not stories.

---

Carbon-14 dating is just one example from the very long laundry list of inconsistencies and holes in the theory. Radiocarbon dates that do not fit evolutionary theory are often excluded by alleging cross-contamination of the sample. In this manner, an evolutionist can present a sample for analysis, and tell the laboratory that he assumes the sample to be somewhere between 50,000 years old and 100,000 years old. Dates that do not conform to this estimate are thrown out. Most C-14 dates are thrown out.

The accuracy of carbon-14 dating relies on faulty assumptions and is subject to bias. At best, radiocarbon dating is only accurate for the past few thousand years. It is science's dirty little secret, and yet they continue to lie that it is proof of evolution.

You are misinformed. Carbon 14 dating is not necessary to the theory of evolution. Simply the order in which fossils are found in the geological strata supports evolution. Nor do paleontologists rely of Carbon 14 dating beyond the dates of it's accuracy.