Evolution is riddled with holes like a piece of Swiss cheese

[Full Circle]

Carbon-14 dating is just one example from the very long laundry list of inconsistencies and holes in the theory. Radiocarbon dates that do not fit evolutionary theory are often excluded by alleging cross-contamination of the sample. In this manner, an evolutionist can present a sample for analysis, and tell the laboratory that he assumes the sample to be somewhere between 50,000 years old and 100,000 years old. Dates that do not conform to this estimate are thrown out. Most C-14 dates are thrown out.

The accuracy of carbon-14 dating relies on faulty assumptions and is subject to bias. At best, radiocarbon dating is only accurate for the past few thousand years. It is science's dirty little secret, and yet they continue to lie that it is proof of evolution.

Don't sweat the 14-C (carbon-14). It has a half-life of 5730 years and consequently isn't useful much beyond 60,000 years. I'm more interested in U-Pb, Th-Pb, K-Ar, Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd dating. They all have half-lives in excess of 500 Ma (Mega-anna, millions of years) and are much more useful in a geological context. ~Paleophyte

---

What is tragic is that many Christians (and I use that word Christian loosely) are succumbing to worldly pressure to adjust their theology to “Make it Fit”

I think you should use the word Christian loosely, after all, it is obvious from your rantings, er posts, that you are a *True Chrsitian™.

True Scotsman much?

*True Chrsitian™ - the one adhering to THE correct babblings of...pick one of the following http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chr...ominations