RE: Evolution is riddled with holes like a piece of Swiss cheese
December 30, 2014 at 12:21 pm
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2014 at 12:35 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(December 29, 2014 at 6:53 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: Carbon-14 dating is just one example from the very long laundry list of inconsistencies and holes in the theory. Radiocarbon dates that do not fit evolutionary theory are often excluded by alleging cross-contamination of the sample. In this manner, an evolutionist can present a sample for analysis, and tell the laboratory that he assumes the sample to be somewhere between 50,000 years old and 100,000 years old. Dates that do not conform to this estimate are thrown out. Most C-14 dates are thrown out.
The accuracy of carbon-14 dating relies on faulty assumptions and is subject to bias. At best, radiocarbon dating is only accurate for the past few thousand years. It is science's dirty little secret, and yet they continue to lie that it is proof of evolution.
Which is why Carbon-dating is used to support archaeology, not evolution.
(December 29, 2014 at 6:58 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: Evolution gives atheists a basis for explaining how life exists apart from a Creator God.
So? If evolution was completely overturned tomorrow, it wouldn't make God a whit more likely, unless it was replaced by scientific evidence of God. Being wrong about something or not knowing something is ignorance and/or error, not God, though with some people those all seem to be synonyms.
(December 29, 2014 at 6:58 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: Evolution denies the need for a God to be involved in the universe.
Nonsense. For one, evolution isn't in the category of things that can deny things. For another, it has nothing to do with whether there's a God involved with the universe. Have you not ever heard of deism?
(December 29, 2014 at 6:58 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: Evolution is the “creation theory” for the religion of atheism.
It's just what the science shows us. Atheism is an opinion on a single topic. It isn't a religion, and neither is mere theism.
(December 29, 2014 at 6:58 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: According to the Bible, the choice is clear. We can believe the Word of our omnipotent and omniscient God, or we can believe the illogically biased, “scientific” explanations of fools.
We can believe credulous fools who think a book saying it's from God means it must really be from God, or we can accept what hard-sought and thoroughly-tested science indicates.
(December 29, 2014 at 6:58 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: Obviously, the evidences for Evolution is obtained through an / a philosophical & Ideological bias.
It's mostly from understanding how heredity works, millions of fossils discovered that conform to the theory's prediction, the findings of genetics and molecular biology, biogeography, and experiments with and observations on organisms with short life cycles.
(December 29, 2014 at 6:58 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: One just has to see the answers posted on this forum by Atheist to see that with their lying Evolution Web sites and pseudo-Science they employ.
Yet over and over and over again, it's you guys and your sources that are exposed as dishonest. If you're right, why does your side have to lie so much?
(December 29, 2014 at 6:58 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: What is tragic is that many Christians (and I use that word Christian loosely) are succumbing to worldly pressure to adjust their theology to “Make it Fit”
There were those who felt the same way when Christians succumbed to the worldly pressure to adjust their theology to 'Make it Fit' the earth revolving around the sun.
(December 29, 2014 at 6:58 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: For it is Written “ 2 Timothy 4:3-4 (NKJV) For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, [because] they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn [their] ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.
That should be in every 'holy' scripture ever, because it will always be true, no matter what the religion. It's like predicting there will be wars and unrest: that is, glaringly obvious rather than much of a prediction.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.