(January 1, 2015 at 6:48 pm)Alex K Wrote: I kinda like the sentiment, because a lot of time is wasted on existence discussions lacking a clear notion of what god is supposed to mean
(January 1, 2015 at 6:40 pm)Surgenator Wrote: "No meaninful definition" is too vague because doesn't specify what is meaningful. From your link, the ignostic position is that no falsifiable definition of God exist. Therefore, you should waste your mental efforts trying to falsify or affirm it.
Is this very different from agnostic?
The difference is mild. Agnosticism says it doesn't know. Ignosticism says mental effort is pointless. So agnosticism can entertain a proof of a God concept while ignosticism won't entrain the idea until the definition is falsifiable.
