While I am convinced that to fully argue against of for God we first have to define what we mean by that. A lot of theists when called on their claims resort to the magical moving goalposts, redefining their god at every setback, at every rebuttal.
However I am of the position that there is a generally agreed upon idea of what a god is. If you say there is an orbiting teapot around mars I don't need to know if it's floral print china or bright green plastic to dismiss the claim. We have a fairly good idea of what the word god has traditionally meant, and that's enough for me to dismiss the claim.
However I am of the position that there is a generally agreed upon idea of what a god is. If you say there is an orbiting teapot around mars I don't need to know if it's floral print china or bright green plastic to dismiss the claim. We have a fairly good idea of what the word god has traditionally meant, and that's enough for me to dismiss the claim.
