Detecting design or intent in nature

[Chas]

---

Here is a few lines on my proof for the existence of God.

To prove the existence of God is actually very easy to do, but when you ask for marks of a design in nature the problem already begins with nature not having any substance of its own to show a design. It therefore is that we must look at beings to see.

Then if beings are said to be what we look at they immediately are the subject to which changes take place, and if that is true they are not the being in charge, on top of which changes are only needed when needed such as Evolutionary Theory would have us know. These potential changes obviously would be inter-generational as they must bring changes about that are permanent and in the right direction as seen from the outside. After all, evolution is in response to the need to survive and flourish in an environment that is involutional to demand that changes must be made, or at least, there must be an awareness that changes may have to be made, or perhaps there is a continuum in which changes are made.

So now we can place involution opposite to evolution and that would place energy opposite entropy with entropy being the period in life that we would call post menopause when eternity is seen from the inside out. This is an assumption I make based on the word meno which is the Greek word for "I remain" that would implicate eternal for us. It is from here that neologic induction can be made to infer wisdom into our speeches so that the next generation will benefit from the life forms we see in our past lives. This would be where speeches can be deductive, seductive and inductive that in the extreme means life or death, with, true enough, an undistributed middle somewhere in between.

For this to be possible all sentient beings are divided on their own mind and this would only be so that the being has an agency outside to be consciously aware and know first hand what exactly is going on 'out there.' This data would be tied down in what we call RNA to be the building blocks for DNA, and that is how Evolution works from my point of view.

Then let me add that Gen.1, 2 and 3 makes this very clear with the postulation of "God" in Gen. 1 as the tension (emerging first cause) between "Lord God" who as man (generic or genus) is the insider in Gen.2 from where "like-god" is the human condition in Gen.3 as the outsider who wants to see for himself -- and actually is doing the dirty work for man as seen from the inside.

So what more do we need if the Intelligent Design is at work right in the bible we read?

This proposition is confirmed with Jesus being the manifestation of Logos (and thus is without being himself and therefore is Omega in his own right with woman as the Alpha in coming to be as Christ in the end.

---

That is the most absurd pile of rotting word salad so far this year.

Congratulations on convoluted stupidity and vacuous views.