RE: Has art jumped the shark after WWI?
January 6, 2015 at 1:05 am
(This post was last modified: January 6, 2015 at 1:10 am by Jenny A.)
(January 5, 2015 at 9:43 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: Erm....do you subscribe to art sites? Because I see people making amazing art every day.
Yes!
(January 5, 2015 at 10:00 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: Dude, all art is an imitation and expansion of the past.
Well, at least a modern take on the past. It's a conversation. If it doesn't at least draw on the past, it's a nonsequiter.
(January 5, 2015 at 11:08 am)Alex K Wrote: It's not like the priests of high art dismiss anything that is past a certain time period, they merely dismiss most popular stuff and concentrate on a rather narrow academic, obscure range of things, or so it seems.
Indeed.
(January 5, 2015 at 11:11 am)Gawdzilla Wrote: Some guy signs a urinal. Such great art.
Shock art and cult of the original. Two for one.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
