Atheism, A Grim Position?

[Esquilax]

I personally think moral systems are essential and good things. What I'm saying, however, is that without some ultimate basis for them, any reasonable person could argue against them or even their elimination. A thoroughgoing anarchist could offer a well reasoned, logically consistent argument that they are perfectly right to do whatever they want and all restrictions on individuals should be eliminated. It's "every man for themselves" is logically defensible without some ultimate basis for morality saying it's not right.

So, you're just going to ignore everything I've said to you in this thread, including the questions I've asked you and the requests for demonstration of your otherwise baseless assertions, in favor of just restating your original position, despite the fact that I've given you plenty of material on why you're wrong, and contentions that you'll need to address for your position to make any kind of justifiable sense?

That's what you're going for here, little more than a "nuh uh!"?