(January 8, 2015 at 1:58 pm)Surgenator Wrote: The main problem is not that your view point is different than most of the people here. The main problem is you don't understand what is considered evidence, who has the burden of proof, and countering your evidence with other phenomena doesn't change who has the burden of proof.
You made several extrodinary claims like spiritual realm, souls, god, strong version of karma, reincarnation, etc... Then you want us to prove you wrong instead of showing these are true. People (in general) are not interested in trying to disprove a negative. So when I present how your evidence makes some unjustified assumptions, you attack the critics character instead of justifing the assumptions. When I present you with a simplier explanantion via artificial NDEs, you want to claim they're not the same without any justification.
Finally, you don't realize that anodotal evidence is not scientific. All your testinomials are worthless because they are based on individual biases, and they can all be explained from known phenomena. Take for example all the testinomials of alien abductions. Do they prove that people are abducted by aliens? No. If they had very similiar stories (which they do), would that prove people are abducted by aliens? Still NO. There was a simple experiment that would of gave scientific evidence for the existence of a soul, which was seeing the number above the operating table. Not one case was successful in telling what the number was.
As a side, when you explain how one realm suppose to interact with a complete other realm (physical with spirit), your arguments would get shread to pieces by the philosophy buffs here. Otherwise, stay around and develop your english writting skills. Hopefully, you'll learn something else as well.Cheers,
Your comment does not answer my point.
I point how to you that many of these NDEs experiences tell about things that they have seen during their NDEs.
Now, forget for a moment about having seen God and focus about having seen more material-physical things.
Once back to life they describe these things like what was inside a room next to the emergency room where they were or a nurse that did something wrong like dropping a baby which got hurt and need surgery.
This clearly prove that the brain was off and something else that they describe like consciousness was the witness entity.
How can you disprove this.
The next point is about what everybody saw.
All these NDEs talk about having seen or perceived that God is there and that dimension is very very beautiful.
If according to you these NDEs are some sort of hallucination why then these people have seen the same sort of things?
Why only God?
Why not a mix of God, the devil, father Christmas and Nembo Kid?
