RE: The ultimate thread against Christianity.
January 11, 2015 at 11:28 pm
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2015 at 11:43 pm by Drich.)
(January 11, 2015 at 2:29 pm)h4ym4n Wrote:Sure lets start with this one. I can back everything I want to talk about here 10 different ways. This site is just the easiest for a common person to understand.(January 11, 2015 at 11:11 am)Drich Wrote: Probably a little better than you do.
Proverbs is what is known as a book of wisdom, and is apart of what is known to the jews as 'The writtings.' The writtings contain everything not prophetic, historical or the law. Meaning there are no commands in the book of proverbs. That is why I asked you if you understood the term proverb. It was a hint to what was in the book and why it was named proverbs. Proverbs contain little bits of wisdom like: a penny saved is a penny earned, or the early bird gets the worm. To say 'lean not unto your own understanding' is a command, is just as foolish as saying one must save all pennies as per the law.
"But don't take my word for it let see what someone else had to say: "
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketuvim
Don't look now sport, but it looks like some of that research I was talking about is comming out to bite you in the rear.
(Someone let the summer queen know I just quoted Lamar burton/reading rainbow host)
Nothing gets your point across any better then quoting a website that has warnings.
Sure this is the site you want to go with drich?
(January 11, 2015 at 2:54 pm)dyresand Wrote:(January 11, 2015 at 2:29 pm)h4ym4n Wrote: Nothing gets your point across any better then quoting a website that has warnings.
Sure this is the site you want to go with drich?
Wikipedia only good when people fact check otherwise its not a great source for anything. There is good things on wikipedia but just saying i won't use it unless need to.
It's also a way for me to determine who can speak to fact, and who needs to appeal to a red herring in order to remain in this conversation.