Woman loses lawsuit over "Girls Gone Wild" video.

[Eilonnwy]

- She consented to the filming by entering the signed, cordoned off ggw area.

Does not imply consent to further being filmed with her top off.

- Rather than being forced to show something she wasn't already showing like going from cleavage-only to nipples, she on her own showed part of the nipple, and the shirt pulling showed a bit more of the same body part. I'm thinking that may have added to questions about whether she did give nipple filming consent (not to be confused with shirt pulling consent).

She said no, that's all the matters. It doesn't matter if she was willing to show cleavage, she was not willing to show her entire breast and that is her right.

- The jury was to only rule on the filming/distribution, not the assault. The assault was never dealt with. The woman was known to her, but she never pressed charges or even got angry at the time. This probably was used against her if she tried to claim any trauma resulting from a criminal act.

Once again, digging for any reason to victim blame. She said no, her image was used illegally, End of Story.

- The fact that she continued hamming it up for the camera and smiling a split second after does not look good for her. It makes it appear that she was ok with it being filmed and expected everything to carry on normally.

Because when you're drunk, that totes equals consent. /sarcasm

Bullshit. It doesn't matter how drunk a person is, if they haven't given consent, that's the end of it.

- It all boils down to whether she gave nipple filming permission. If the only nipple exposure was by assault, there might not have been any legal question, and she would have won.

She didn't, so why are you still arguing and victim blaming?