RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
January 15, 2015 at 11:13 pm
(This post was last modified: January 15, 2015 at 11:18 pm by Heywood.)
(January 15, 2015 at 10:21 pm)IATIA Wrote: First cell on earth. STUPID. > evolution > First man on earth. SMART.
However, you have yet to do anything but make a claim. Not one example, not one shred of evidence. In all these pages. nothing but, "I have faith". BFD. You are a perfect example of evolution without intellect.
The defense rests.
Sorry dummy,
Your claim that the first cell on earth arose without the aid of intellect is based solely on your faith and not any observation.
You will have to try harder.
(January 15, 2015 at 10:35 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(January 15, 2015 at 9:22 pm)Heywood Wrote: We did not observe the origination of the evolutionary system which is responsible for our existence so that is not a valid example.
The evolutionary systems found to exist in the natural universe are not valid examples of evolutionary systems in nature?
lolwut?
Pretty sure the OP is about the thing you are currently claiming to be invalid.
Benny, the evolutionary system which created you is not an example of an evolutionary system known not to have required an intellect because we have no observations of its coming into existence.
I know you believe it came into existence without intellect, but that belief of yours is based on faith and not any objective observation.
My belief that evolutionary systems require intellects is based on observations I have made of evolutionary systems whose circumstances of origination are known to me and I find each an every one of them requires intellect.
Based on observations the proposition that all evolutionary systems require intellect is more likely to be true than the proposition that not all evolutionary systems require intellect.
