(August 4, 2010 at 9:09 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: We don't require science to recognise it as possible. We are, after all considering a metaphysical being not limited by physics here. What we do require is clear logical reasoning why it shouldn't be possible. If there is no reason not to consider it, then we can continue to use the consideration in our conjecture.
You already have a clear logical reason to believe that such a being has never existed and never had any foot print on this world in any way, sense, or form but you've decided to believe that this being exists based on no actual reason to do so.
Niether I, no anyone else, needs to prove that such a being doesn't exist because that would imply that there is some reason to believe he does. What needs to happen is that the people who claim such a being exists do so for no reason whatsoever and need to provide evidence to prove that to be the case.
