RE: WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER...
January 17, 2015 at 6:51 am
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2015 at 6:54 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(January 17, 2015 at 4:39 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Once again I'll spell it out for you,
"elected government officials being a reflection of social attitudes." is Esquilax's point, I DISAGREED WITH THAT POSITION.
No. his position was:
Quote:... Which feed into/are reflections of social attitudes [...]
He's clearly stating that there's a feedback loop happening here, which you oversimplify (understandably, considering your limitations):
(January 15, 2015 at 3:47 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I wouldn't call choosing the lesser of two evils (democrat/republican) an accurate reflection of "social attitudes" there is simply no other choice.
and then try to strut about as if you have made a point. That is the point I'm making here, you're either an idiot who doesn't understand his point, or you're a dishonest asshole deliberately misrepresenting it.
Myself, my money is on "dishonest idiot". Who says you can't eat your cake and have it too?
(January 17, 2015 at 4:39 am)Huggy74 Wrote: So saying to ME "I wouldn't call a selection made in the voting booth the only expression of a nation's identity." is neither here nor there, it is only relevant to Esquilax since that HIS point.
No, it's directly addressing your strawman, which you're either too stupid to see you've erected, or too dishonest to admit to creating.
(January 17, 2015 at 4:39 am)Huggy74 Wrote: So in that way your response is addressing Esquilax not me
No, you're not only wrong, you're unaware.
(January 17, 2015 at 4:39 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I think it fits you perfectly, aren't you a musician? Aren't the Muppets also musicians? Sounds pretty creative to me.
... said the guy who thinks the Bible sounds pretty factual. Dumbfuck.
