Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 16, 2026, 11:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Large Hadron Collider refit to solve more questions
#36
RE: Large Hadron Collider refit to solve more questions
(January 17, 2015 at 8:26 am)Alex K Wrote: P.s. I think your confusion about my talk about friction maybe came from the fact that when you hear matter, you first think of a solid, not a dilute gas. By friction I just meant a shorthand for losing energy during movement because of inelastic processes. Maybe that's not such a great word choice, but I used it for lack.of a better one.

No, I understood what you meant by friction, it's just difficult to wrap my head around. But then that seems to be the case for almost everything about particle physics - classical physics makes perfect sense, we can play with matter and energy and directly observe the relation between energy, mass, friction, inertia, and so on. Particle physics regularly produces results which seem (to me at least) to be counter-intuitive.

So I simply have to accept that whatever it is that is distorting the images of visible bodies in the background must, by dint of its ability to distort space-time, have mass. Yet it does not interact with "normal" matter in any other discernible way, thus being "frictionless."

My brain doesn't like the idea of something that has mass (and therefore gravity) yet doesn't interact with the visible Universe other than via gravity. Question: Dark matter creates a gravity well, but isn't "pulled" by other gravity wells? Do I have that right?

Just for the record, my brain doesn't like quantum entanglement either. I find that the only way I can learn about particle physics is to tell my common sense to shut up and accept that reality is far weirder than I can fully grasp.

As has been said by others, I am extremely grateful that you see fit to spend some of your time answering these (presumably simplistic) laymans' questions. Your above lengthy post in answer to my questions provided a number of "aha!" moments, which are always fun.

Now I need to return to something I actually do understand: fermenting tempeh culture in black beans. Thank the FSM for the macro level of reality!

I look forward to further brain-picking sessions.

Popcorn
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Large Hadron Collider refit to solve more questions - by Davka - January 17, 2015 at 3:08 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Physics questions ignoramus 21 6123 May 9, 2019 at 6:27 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  SMASH Theory Claims to Solve 5 Major Questions of Physics AFTT47 0 1923 February 20, 2017 at 10:14 pm
Last Post: AFTT47
  Physics questions about light bennyboy 10 4732 September 20, 2016 at 9:26 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Questions About the Big Bang Rhondazvous 14 5349 July 12, 2016 at 4:22 pm
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Questions about Evolution Rhondazvous 6 2624 October 26, 2015 at 12:18 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Questions about Time, Distance, and Relativity Mudhammam 25 9503 November 11, 2014 at 11:30 pm
Last Post: Mudhammam
  Quantum Physics: Questions logicalreason 22 9800 August 11, 2014 at 5:38 am
Last Post: Tobie
  Timelapse: Cerro Paranal Skies Above the Very Large Telescope orogenicman 6 3695 December 28, 2011 at 11:20 am
Last Post: orogenicman
  some questions about the age (of earth, universe, etc.) Zenith 2 3300 June 21, 2011 at 10:46 am
Last Post: Zenith



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)