(January 24, 2015 at 3:41 am)snowtracks Wrote:(January 22, 2015 at 12:37 am)dyresand Wrote: Still a argument for god did it is irrational. If god did it we would obviously know there is a god or gods present we would be able to contact god we would be even able to see god in a since. There would be more evidence for a heaven existing instead of blatant likes like heaven is for real.The statement 'I believe only what I can see' is in itself contradictory since belief is not physical. Actually, many things exist that can't be observed. Some very real scientific entities, such as magnetism, gravity, and electricity cannot be seen. Critical abstracts, such as numbers, sets, propositions, and properties, cannot be seen either...yet they exist. Justice, goodness, and other morals are real, but they are also undetectable by the senses. The concepts of truth and love are invisible realities. And by the way, just because we're limited by a body doesn't mean God is. The point is 'seeing is believing' is the very limiting, but if that's what you want to go with, that's perfectly fine.
Well, given that nobody fucking said "I believe only what I can see," despite the fact that you put quotations around those words, I suppose what you're saying is just nothing but one big deflection to avoid talking about the argument from ignorance you keep making, eh?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!