Let The Creatard Shitting of Bricks Begineth

[snowtracks]

That's a problem, isn't it? Title reads 'dna found', and article means 'dna building blocks'. The presence of early Earth’s building-block materials is not enough to explain the origin of life. These materials must be able to combine in a stepwise manner to form more-complex chemical entities that in turn could evolve into the first life-forms.
Nasa is desperately trying to increase their funding by distorting an article title and promoting a creaky and exhausted 19'th century materialism.

NASA didn't write that article, or its headline.

Here's the official NASA article: "DNA Building Blocks Can Be Made in Space"

NASA-funded researchers have evidence that some building blocks of DNA, the molecule that carries the genetic instructions for life, found in meteorites were likely created in space. The research gives support to the theory that a “kit” of ready-made parts created in space and delivered to Earth by meteorite and comet impacts assisted the origin of life.

International Business Times sensationalized their headline. It's not NASA's fault. They were more precise in their phrasing. Nowhere in that article does it state that fully-assembled extraterrestrial DNA was found.

You could have figured that out on your own, but it's not like anyone expects honesty or effort from the likes of you. You only saw what you mistakenly assumed was an opportunity to score desperately-needed points for the dying superstition you choose to cling to, and now you've made an idiot of yourself.

Just some poetic license since your guy posted a 'new' topic from 2011, and used this, "Quote:NASA: DNA Found on Meteorites Indicates Life May Have Originated in Space"; and it received 16 kudos from your guys who thought this article was so wonderful (dna from outer space!)...or else they were oblivious to the fact that 'building blocks' were scatter thoughout the universe from the big bang.