RE: WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER...
January 27, 2015 at 12:39 am
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2015 at 12:42 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(January 26, 2015 at 11:35 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Look muppet,[...]
lol, you're funny when you're butthurt.
(January 26, 2015 at 11:35 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Since you're the resident genius here, why don't you explain how this post
(January 15, 2015 at 12:28 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: ... I'd rather redefine "back-pedal" so that it has a meaning amenable to my point.is relevant to anything I said.
I'd rather let you go back through the thread and find your own mistakes. I think that would be an edifying exercise for you, because you clearly need practice identifying the hidden premises in your own argumentation, so that you can learn to avoid retreating over bridges you've already burnt.
All that's a fancy way of saying think for yourself. No one else, especially me, is going to let you off easy.
(January 26, 2015 at 11:35 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Also, to point out a fallacy in your argument.
https://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-p...#pid846415
(January 26, 2015 at 10:45 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Secular countries are neutral towards religion. Atheist countries obviously aren't neutral towards religion. I'm not sure the source of your difficulty in understanding this basic difference.
You state that "Atheist countries obviously aren't neutral towards religion", But that would then mean that religious countries obviously aren't neutral to things A-religious, correct?
Not necessarily, no. A religious country might have no formal opinion about gasoline vs diesel power for public transport.
