Quote:Evolution is an idea. God is an entity.
I'm sorry, but I couldn't get past this. Evolution is a process. God either doesn't exist or there is no way of knowing quite what it is.
Allow me to attempt to simplify this conversation. Your argument is that evolution is too complicated to be as simple to prove or disprove as god because god is an absolute. That's not the case. Just as many complications can theoretically be applied to the god question as the evolution 'question.'
For example:
Is evolution real? Yes, A,B and C are proof of that.
Does god exist? No, A,B and C are proof that is does not.
Then, a more complicated question:
Do trees evolve? Yes, rada, rada, rada.
What is god made of? *Insert guess here*
The initial questions, which you illogically answered (according to the test) remain the same, regardless of the other complications of the topic.
Now, all of these things are irrelevant because the game only asks you essentially what you require as proof. The answers are not complicated enough for your hypothetical complications to be a consideration when answering said questions. You didn't pass the "logic test" so you think it is illogical, which is, in and of itself, illogical. That is not to say that the test is right or wrong. It is to say that you are grasping at straws to debunk the test and prove you are a logical thinker.
