Battleground God

[Shell B]

Your 'simplification' demonstrates that you did not actually make any attempt to read my argument.
The fact that you admit you did not read my post is irritating. I went though an effort to explain my argument in three different methods, methods that had you'd read, you would have noticed already covered your 'counter-argument'.

If you wish to go back and actually read the post and continue the debate, I would be happy to respond to you again. Otherwise, I accept your concession of the point.

I did read your posts. When I said I couldn't get past this, I did not mean I couldn't read past it. I meant that I couldn't get over how weird of a statement it was. Nonetheless, I did find your posts to be rambling and irrelevant. The fact of the matter is that you have taken some very simple, to the point questions and applied a complicated, convoluted form of logic to them either while you were answering them or while you were justifying having answered them 'incorrectly.' Again, that is not to say that the game is right or wrong.

Speaking of poor logic, you are going to accept a concession that does not exist? I do not claim to be the most logical person, being a female writer and all. However, I have never expended as much energy to prove myself right after missing some questions on some silly game as you have. It's fine that you don't think the game is logical. I just found your explanation for it rather silly. I'm sorry that you're irritated, but that's your choice.