(January 28, 2015 at 12:00 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(January 28, 2015 at 11:57 am)watchamadoodle Wrote: Hmmm. I only glanced at it. I agree that many of the examples I saw were a little silly. For example, 2 million people gathering for Obama's inauguration is not comparable, because the crowd was supported by the logistics of Washington, D.C. and dissipated after a day or so.
No, I mean his source is straight up horseshit from top to bottom. It's a site specifically dedicated to advancing and justifying the views of its specific Christian sect. Any 'evidence' they might put forward is hopelessly tainted. If Drich wants to give actual information, he should use sources that are peer-reviewed, have actual historical and scientific references, and are not dedicated to advancing an ideology at any cost to intellectual honesty and open discussion.
Omg..
So... you are trying to dismiss all that data with sweeping baseless dismissal base on your 'home page' comment?
seriously, are you mentally handicap? if so I'll let this go. if not to whom does your arguement work for? those who want to keep their heads burried in the sand?
If someone want to know the feesiablity of a undertaking like this and has solid evidence that supports it's plausiblity, an intelectually honest person looking to refute such a claim start disassembling the evidence provided.
But, that's not what you did. You made fun of their home page, dismissed the content because it was not in agreement to what you want to hear and poo poo'ed on everything, Without addressing one single point.
