Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 13, 2024, 3:01 pm
Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
Churches oppose three-person baby plan

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Churches oppose three-person baby plan
Nine Offline
Bee-ad
****
Religious Views: Queen Bee
Posts: 4344
Threads: 43
Joined: February 21, 2012
Reputation: 64
#17
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan
January 30, 2015 at 7:51 pm (This post was last modified: January 30, 2015 at 7:58 pm by Nine.)
Isn't it just pretty much assumed anything to do with sex and reproduction will be immediately opposed by religious groups by this point?
(January 30, 2015 at 7:32 pm)Xeno Wrote: My question is, why does a group of old celibate virgins take so much interest in childbirth?

Jelly?

Because complaining about its probably as close to a sexual act as they will ever get.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
Churches oppose three-person baby plan

Messages In This Thread
Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - January 30, 2015 at 6:45 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 6:48 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - February 3, 2015 at 9:14 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - January 30, 2015 at 6:52 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 6:54 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - January 30, 2015 at 6:59 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 7:08 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Nope - January 30, 2015 at 7:18 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Nope - January 30, 2015 at 7:02 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - January 30, 2015 at 7:10 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 7:13 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Cyberman - January 30, 2015 at 7:25 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 7:30 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 7:27 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Lucanus - January 30, 2015 at 7:34 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Nine - January 30, 2015 at 7:51 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - January 30, 2015 at 8:10 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by c172 - January 30, 2015 at 8:18 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - January 30, 2015 at 8:19 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Cyberman - January 30, 2015 at 8:22 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Minimalist - January 30, 2015 at 9:06 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Regina - February 2, 2015 at 11:23 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by FreeTony - February 2, 2015 at 11:43 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Aisha - February 3, 2015 at 6:44 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Radco - February 3, 2015 at 8:15 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Aisha - February 3, 2015 at 8:17 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - February 3, 2015 at 2:12 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - February 3, 2015 at 2:22 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by JesusHChrist - February 3, 2015 at 2:30 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - February 3, 2015 at 2:30 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - February 3, 2015 at 2:45 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - February 3, 2015 at 2:50 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  On the consciousness of a new born baby Macoleco 8 1101 April 7, 2022 at 7:22 am
Last Post: brewer
  The HIV plan brewer 2 377 February 7, 2019 at 2:22 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  Human baby gene editing is here? brewer 9 1380 November 29, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  "The first person to live to [200, 300, 500, 1000] has already been born" Heat 218 22255 December 14, 2015 at 9:18 pm
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  Baby raccoons IATIA 7 1799 November 23, 2015 at 12:28 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Next-Gen Test Tube Baby Born pineapplebunnybounce 4 2576 July 12, 2013 at 4:46 pm
Last Post: pineapplebunnybounce
  ‘Adventurous’ Woman Needed as Surrogate for Neanderthal Baby TaraJo 25 8900 January 29, 2013 at 2:40 am
Last Post: Cinjin
  About a baby gamerguy86 6 2353 June 23, 2012 at 8:23 pm
Last Post: gamerguy86
  All part of gods great plan. Zen Badger 15 5027 February 11, 2012 at 9:19 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Orangutan helping out a baby bird. downbeatplumb 13 4240 June 19, 2011 at 12:59 am
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)