RE: A simple challenge for atheists
February 2, 2015 at 10:43 am
(This post was last modified: February 2, 2015 at 10:56 am by SteveII.)
(February 2, 2015 at 10:37 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: If you honestly can't gather that from the last 70+ pages, I have to wonder about the level of your reading ability.
I can't for the life of me think why believing 4 accounts of events is circular. You can level the charge of wrong, stupid, misguided, etc. but circular has a specific meaning. Special pleading also has a specific meaning. What am I "exempting from a generally accepted rule or principle without justifying the exemption"? Miracles? In fact you are employing special pleading in the case of miracles because you insist that an eyewitness testimony is not sufficient to prove a miracle exists when eyewitness testimony is accepted for every other event. You only exempt miracles based on your naturalistic philosophy.