Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 17, 2025, 11:08 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dare to interpret?
#9
RE: Dare to interpret?
(February 3, 2015 at 12:32 pm)Cato Wrote: Some people have way too much time on their hands. I suppose I get the fact that mutiple computers working simultaneously could conceivably save computing time and space, but I'm confident that the number of digits we're talking about to make this a consideration is absurd. I'm struggling to think of any other practical application.

We rarely see what useful things pure research will yield, but it always results in knowledge.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Dare to interpret? - by LivingNumbers - January 27, 2015 at 10:10 pm
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Fidel_Castronaut - February 3, 2015 at 7:01 am
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Alex K - February 3, 2015 at 8:25 am
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Mudhammam - February 3, 2015 at 8:35 am
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Strider - February 3, 2015 at 10:45 am
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Alex K - February 3, 2015 at 10:51 am
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Norman Humann - February 3, 2015 at 11:35 am
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Cato - February 3, 2015 at 12:32 pm
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Chas - February 3, 2015 at 1:30 pm
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Little lunch - February 3, 2015 at 1:43 pm
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Alex K - February 3, 2015 at 2:07 pm
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Cato - February 3, 2015 at 2:56 pm
RE: Dare to interpret? - by Alex K - February 3, 2015 at 4:02 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)