(February 6, 2015 at 6:43 am)robvalue Wrote: A trivial yet entirely factually correct assessment of your very own statement you piece of shit.
Yeah, I always love when a Christian makes absolute statements about some facet of their faith (particularly revolving around heaven, hell, and salvation), but then get all vague and pissy when you bring up that they just implied there's a predictable, gamable system. So, she figured out the way to "win" at his system, and he got all butthurt. He couldn't refute her without backpeddling or adding additional ad hoc qualifiers, so he had to just criticize her comment without addressing it.
This reminds me of someone I read about on this forum a month ago or so. She believed that God would not send anyone to hell if they hadn't heard of him, because they didn't have a chance, and she didn't maintain any mumbo jumbo about the Holy Spirit coming to each person in an "undeniable" way or anything. Of course, once you know God exists, it's now up to free will and your choice, and now each person that knows has a non-zero chance of going to hell.
My first thought was "Stop telling people about God, you asshole! You're condemning people to hell!"
This is why most people keep their statements about heaven and hell sufficiently vague. Platitudes and non-statements are harder to openly refute or even address.
