RE: A question for Christians who accept evolution.
August 14, 2010 at 6:56 am
(This post was last modified: August 14, 2010 at 6:57 am by Zen Badger.)
(August 13, 2010 at 1:28 pm)theophilus Wrote:That article is basically admitting that the the bible is not the inerrant word of god after all, that it is just the words of erring men. Either that, or god is so stupid he had to wait until human science came along so he could work out that what he had created was mammalian, not avian.(August 13, 2010 at 7:56 am)Zen Badger Wrote: If god is "omniscient and omnipotent" as you claim then how is it that he doesn't know that bats are mammals, not birds?The classification system by which bats are considered mammels was invented in 1735 and the Bible was written a long time before that.
Perhaps you should read this:
http://www.carm.org/bible-difficulties/g...y/bat-bird
Quote:There is a looooong list of animals that god considers to be abominations, if so, why did he create them in the first place?So in order to punish Adam, god decides to randomly punish innocent animals as well.
When he created the world there was no distinction between clean and unclean animals. The world and everything in it have been changed as a result of Adam's sin.
Your arguments get less and less convincing all the time.
But keep it up buddy, they're entertaining at least.
![Popcorn Popcorn](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.